USR PUBLISHER

SUB LINE FOR THE WEB SITE

Journal Policy

The Universal Scientific Research Publishers (USR) adheres to rigorous editorial policies to uphold scholarly integrity and maintain high standards in publication. These policies ensure fairness, transparency, and ethical conduct throughout the submission, review, and publication processes.

Editorial Independence
The editorial board operates independently, with decisions based solely on the quality, originality, and relevance of submitted manuscripts. Editorial decisions are free from external influences, ensuring an unbiased evaluation process.
Peer Review Process
USR publishers  follows a double-blind peer review process:
  • Initial Screening: Manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial team for adherence to submission guidelines and suitability for the journal.
  • Reviewer Selection: Experts in the relevant field evaluate the manuscript for scientific rigor and contribution to the field.
  • Criteria: Reviews assess originality, methodology, clarity, ethical compliance, and significance
  • Appeals: Authors may request reconsideration with detailed rebuttals
  • Feedback: The editorial board makes the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations.
  • Final Decision: Open availability ensures that policymakers and clinicians can readily access and apply the latest findings.
Retraction and Correction Policy
  • Retractions: Articles may be retracted for ethical violations, fabrication, or errors that invalidate findings.
  • Corrections: Minor errors that do not affect the article’s conclusions will be corrected through errata.